Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: May 24, 2004 1:09am
Forum: opensource_movies Subject: Jack2, The Points You Neglected to Fully Defend...

From your review:
Now add your venemous words and hey presto, your enemy is shown as a vile,disp,icable person,worthy only of c ontempt..


Please cite one example of "venomous" words added to Come Join the Fun.

There was NO personal attack as my review only referred to the film.


Your review refered to the filmmaker's actions, and specifically to his "geek words" -- a direct insult, also known as a personal attack. Explain, please, how this could be read as anything other than a personal attack.

Nobody has challenged the basic premise of my review, that the film established a precedent..


Please show exactly how that was the "basic premise" of your review, which never mentions precident.

Please answer one point at a time, and stay on target! We are not discussing Michael Moore, George Putnam, Australian Slander Laws, the high price of DVDs, or anything else. To recap:

1. Defend your contention that venomous words were added to Come Join the Fun.

2. Defend your contention that there was no personal attack in your review.

3. Defend your contention that setting precident was a point in your review.


This post was modified by ridetheory on 2004-05-24 08:09:48

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: May 24, 2004 5:16am
Forum: opensource_movies Subject: Re: Jack2, The Points You Neglected to Fully Defend...

I have suffered from 36 (thirty six) postings in this forum , just because I posted a review . You have had your chance. You have left me tired, irritated and left me shocked at the lack of intellectual honesty or decency.. GOODBYE AND GOOD RIDDANCE

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ridetheory Date: May 24, 2004 11:51am
Forum: opensource_movies Subject: Re: Jack2, The Points You Neglected to Fully Defend...

"This is the standard response when there is no answer."


Right back atcha, big fella!

This post was modified by ridetheory on 2004-05-24 18:51:27

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: May 29, 2004 11:30am
Forum: opensource_movies Subject: Re: Jack2, The Points You Neglected to Fully Defend...

Thank you for another of your Kenneth Williams Quotations

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Spuzz Date: May 24, 2004 5:54am
Forum: opensource_movies Subject: Re: Jack2, The Points You Neglected to Fully Defend...

???